USPTO serial 76407517
COMMUNICANT SEMICONDUCTOR TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COMMUNICANT SEMICONDUCTOR TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Communicant Semiconductor Technologies AG
D-15236 Frankfurt / Oder, DE
Other trademarks owned by Communicant Semiconductor Technologies AG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karl Hormann, Esq.
KARL HORMANN ESQ LAW OFFICE OF KARL HORMANNP O BOX 381516CAMBRIDGE, MA 02238-1516UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic components, electronic semiconductor components, electronic circuits, integrated circuits, electronic circuits on chips, electronic chips , consumer electronics, automotive electronics | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Trade show exhibitions in the field of electronics, providing trade information and consultation; placing and preparing advertisement by printed and virtual media for others; publication of advertising texts; demonstration of goods for advertising purposes; and data processing for others in the field of electronic component manufacturing | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Research in the field of semiconductor process technology, development of prototypes, development of industrially compatible designs, development of production technologies for wireless communication circuits, development of computer software, design of circuits and photo mask designs, conducting component, circuit and reliability tests, processing of electronic circuits, capping of electronic circuits and electronic components | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Communicant Semiconductor Technologies AG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named COMMUNICANT SEMICONDUCTOR TECHNOLOGIES
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |