USPTO serial 76407519
Serial No. 76407519
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 76407519?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Schaumburg, IL
Schaumburg, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. Sandlin Grimm
M SANDLIN GRIMM MORRIS, MANNING & MARTIN, LLP1600 ATLANTA FINANCIAL CTR 3343 PEACHTREE RD NEATLANTA, GA 30326-1044Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software, namely, software used for automated management, analysis, and execution of business processes in the field of real time decision support, business visualization, workflow analysis, enterprise resource analysis, business process automation, and infrastructure software for distributed application management support | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 22, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |