Drawing for GRAINDROPS

USPTO serial 76407557

GRAINDROPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2878332Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 31, 2004
Examiner
ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRAINDROPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary A. Moy

Mary A. Moy LADAS & PARRY26 West 61st StreetNew York, NY 10023UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Vegetable milk substitutes based on grain and soySECTION 18 - CANCELLED
030Vegetable puddings based on grain and soySECTION 18 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 16, 2008C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL
Apr 16, 2008CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Dec 17, 2007CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999
Aug 24, 2007PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Aug 31, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 8, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 19, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 19, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 7, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 14, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Sep 29, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Mar 11, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 29, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 28, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance