USPTO serial 76407566
AIRTACT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIRTACT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B. G. Horowitz
Robert B. G. Horowitz Baker & Hostetler LLP45 Rockefeller PlazaNew York, NY 10111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | wireless communication apparatus, namely, portable televisions equipped with wireless communication appliances, telephones, global computer network browsers/viewers, audio/video disc players and personal computers; data storage media, namely, packaged semiconductors; computer programs to be installed in portable televisions equipped with wireless communication appliances, telephones, global computer network browsers/viewers, audio/video disc players and personal computers, for remote operation of other display products such as televisions, projectors, monitors for personal computers and plasma display panels | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 21, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 25, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |