USPTO serial 76407682
Serial No. 76407682
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 76407682?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore A. Breiner
THEODORE A BREINER BREINER & BREINER, LLCP O BOX 19290ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320-0290UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Custom manufacture of fertilizers and fertilizer ingredients for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 11, 2006 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 11, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |