USPTO serial 76408182
EPM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EPM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mexico 15220, D.F., MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hector Gonzalez Berlanga
Hector Gonzalez Berlanga Gonzalez Berlanga y AsociadosAv. Irrigacion 49 - 1er pisoCo. IrrigacionMexico City, D.F., C.P. 11510Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Paints, varnishes; lacquers; preservatives against rust and against deterioration of wood; colourants; mordants; raw natural resins, metals in foil and powder form for painters, decorators, printers and arts; paints, varnishes and lacquers for industry, handcrafts and art; colourants for clothing; colourants for food and beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Paper, paper products and office articles; paper, cardboard and goods from said materials not included in other classes, printed matter; bookbinding material; stationery; adhesives for stationery or household purposes; artists' materials; paint brushes; office requisites (except furniture); plastic materials for packing (not included in other classes); playing cards; printers' type; printing blocks; paper cutters; sheets, sacks or plastic bags for packaging | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications; information treatment and on line data processing via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 8, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 2, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |