USPTO serial 76408503
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Braeside, Victoria, AU
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric T. Fingerhut
ERIC T FINGERHUT SHAW PITTMAN2300 N ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-1122UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | CLOCKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | BOOKENDS; PIN BOARDS FOR DISPLAY | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | WORKS OF ART OF WOOD, NAMELY, TOYCRATES, NOTICEBOARDS, HATSTANDS, BOOKENDS, PHOTOFRAMES, WALL PLAQUES; MIRRORS, CLOCKS AND DOORKNOBS; BINS, BOXES, CRATES AND CASES OF WOOD; CHESTS FOR TOYS; CHESTS OF DRAWERS; COTS; NON-METAL CLOTHES HOOKS;COAT HANGERS; COAT, COSTUME AND HAT STANDS; PHOTOGRAPH FRAMES, WOODEN FRAMES, HAND-CRAFTED WOODEN FRAMES; WOODEN NAMEPLATES; DECORATIVE WALL PLAQUES (NOT OF TEXTILE); MOBILES FOR DECORATION; WALL MIRRORS; TABLES, CHAIRS AND FURNITURE; CUSHIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | WOODEN WASTE PAPER BINS | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | BED LINEN, NAMELY, QUILT COVERS, FITTED SHEETS, PILLOW CASES, CRIB QUILT COVERS, CRIB SHEETS, CURTAINS AND ROLLS OF FABRIC FOR HOME DECORATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | ADVERTISING SERVICES, NAMELY, DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING FOR OTHERS; CONDUCTING MARKETING RESEARCH AND STUDIES; PUBLIC RELATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |