USPTO serial 76408555
SAFEGUARDING YOUR FUTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SAFEGUARDING YOUR FUTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Watford, Hertfordshire WD2 2BW, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William M. Lee Jr.
WILLIAM M LEE JR BARNES & THORNBURGPO BOX 2786CHICAGO, IL 60690-2786UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | EXPLOSIVES DETECTORS; NARCOTICS DETECTORS; NARCOTICS DETECTORS; HAND-HELD EXPLOSIVES DETECTORS; HAND-HELD PORTAL SCANNERS FOR EXPLOSIVES AND NARCOTICS DETECTORS; BIOLOGICAL AGENT DETECTORS; HAND-HELD BIOLOGICAL AGENT DETECTORS; CHEMICAL AGENT DETECTORS; HAND-HELD CHEMICAL AGENT DETECTORS; TOXIC INDUSTRIAL CHEMICAL DETECTORS; DATA PROCESSORS; COMPUTERS; COMPUTER PROGRAMS, NAMELY COMPUTER OPERATING PROGRAMS FOR THE FOREGOING GOODS; DATA CARRIERS, NAMELY MAGNETIC TAPES, MAGNETIC AND OPTICAL DISCS, CD-ROMS, COMPACT DISCS AND SOLID-STATE DEVICES, ALL PRE-RECORDED WITH COMPUTER PROGRAMS AS AFORESAID | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |