USPTO serial 76408685
SMARTBIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMARTBIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Merton E. Thompson, IV
MERTON E THOMPSON, IV FISH & RICHARDSON PC225 FRANKLIN STBOSTON, MA 02110-2804UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION AND ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEM COMPRISED OF COMPUTERS; COMPUTER PERIPHERAL DEVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC CARD READERS, INTEGRATED CIRCUIT CARD READERS, INTEGRATED CIRCUIT CARD WRITERS, AND OPTICAL FINGERPRINT SENSORS; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN OPERATING A PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION AND ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEM; DATA PROCESSORS; MAGNETIC DATA MEDIA, NAMELY, MAGNETIC CODED CARDS, OPTICAL DATA MEDIA, NAMELY, OPTICAL DISKS AND OPTICAL ENCODED CARDS, ENCODED INTEGRATED CIRCUIT CARDS, ALL CONTAINING PROGRAMMING USED TO OPERATE A PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION AND ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEM | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | ON-LINE DATA PROCESSING SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS; MAINTENANCE AND UPDATING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE DESIGN, SELECTION, IMPLEMENTATION AND USE OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE SYSTEMS FOR OTHERS; RENTAL OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; LEASING OF COMPUTER NETWORK SERVER; APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER (ASP) FEATURING SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF PERSONAL AUTHENTICATION, ACCESS CONTROL, DATABASE MANAGEMENT, WORD PROCESSING AND AS A SPREADSHEET; DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE FOR OTHERS OF A HOME PAGE ON THE INTERNET | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | PROVIDING AN ON-LINE DATABASE IN THE FIELD OF PERSONAL AUTHENTICATION AND ACCESS CONTROL | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |