USPTO serial 76409530
TASTINGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TASTINGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant services, excluding the offering of wine samples and spirit samples | ACTIVE | Aug 13, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |