Drawing for CABARET

USPTO serial 76409768

CABARET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOAGNI, MARY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CABARET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lucian Wayne Beavers

LUCIAN WAYNE BEAVERS WADDEY & PATTERSON PC1600 DIVISION ST STE 500NASHVILLE, TN 37203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
015Pianos and structural parts thereof; accessories for pianos, namely fitted piano keyboard coversACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 24, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 24, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 28, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 8, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 6, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 6, 2005REINREINSTATED—
Dec 1, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 8, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 24, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 10, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 3, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 19, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 2, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 12, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 10, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 29, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance