Drawing for INTELLINET CONTROLS

USPTO serial 76409907

INTELLINET CONTROLS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTELLINET CONTROLS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stanley M. Schurgin

STANLEY M SCHURGIN WEINGARTEN, SCHURGIN, GAGNEBIN & LEBOVICTEN POST OFFICE SQBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic hardware and software for control and monitoring of residential electrical devices, namely, audio distribution, home theatre, heating, ventilating, air conditioning and energy management equipmentACTIVEMar 7, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 15, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Mar 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 29, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 9, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 25, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance