USPTO serial 76410090
THE STORY CHANNEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE STORY CHANNEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK L. NOWAK
MARK L NOWAK RUTHERFORD MULHALL & WARGO, PA2600 N MILITARY TRAIL 4TH FLBOCA RATON, FL 33431-6387UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Cable television and television broadcasting and broadcasting programs via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education and entertainment services, in the nature of cable television, television and online television program production and programming, including but not limited to the field of children or original, reproduced and adapted children's literary, pictorial, and educational works | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 26, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |