USPTO serial 76410310
INCASE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHEFFIELD, SHARI
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INCASE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-37070 Gottingen, DE
D-37070 Gottingen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dennis E. Stenzel, Esq.
DENNIS E STENZEL ESQ CHERNOFF, VILHAUER, MCCLUNG & STENZEL1600 ODS TWR601 S W SECOND AVEPORTLAND, OR 97204-3157Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | VEHICLE SAFETY EQUIPMENT AND COMPONENTS THEREOF, NAMELY, SEAT BELTS, HEAD RESTRAINTS, NECK RESTRAINTS, NECK SUPPORTS, HEAD RESTS AND AIR BAGS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 11, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 13, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |