USPTO serial 76410480
DUNHILL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DUNHILL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Apolzon
LAWRENCE E APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | cigarettes, cigars, roll your own tobacco, pipe tobacco, tobacco and smoker's accessories not of precious metal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |