Drawing for GO BEYOND NORMAL LIMITS

USPTO serial 76410610

GO BEYOND NORMAL LIMITS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2848511Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 1, 2004
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with GO BEYOND NORMAL LIMITS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott J. Slavick

Scott J. Slavick BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONEP.O. BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Portable transceivers, repeaters, telephonic patching units, radio telephones, wireless data communication linking units, amplifiers/chargers, battery chargers, wireless phone line extenders, wireless current loop communications units, wireless remote control systems, comprised of portable transceivers, radio receivers, radio callboxes, and radio base stationsSECTION 8 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 2, 2015CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9
Jun 18, 2010C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jun 18, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 1, 2010E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED
Jun 1, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 31, 2004CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED
Mar 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Mar 15, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Feb 26, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Feb 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 11, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 15, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 15, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 22, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 2, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 26, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 17, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance