Drawing for SKYQUEST

USPTO serial 76410900

SKYQUEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SKYQUEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adam D. Resnick, Esquire

ANN K FORD ESQ PIPER RUDNICK LLP1200 NINETEENTH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-2412UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT TOOLS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR APPLICATION AND DATABASE INTEGRATION; DATABASE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE IN THE FIELD OF CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT; DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DATABASE MANAGEMENT IN THE FIELD OF CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENTACTIVE—
035BUSINESS MARKETING CONSULTING SERVICES PERTAINING TO CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT FOR OTHERS; BUSINESS MARKETING CONSULTING SERVICESACTIVE—
042PROVIDING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE IN THE FIELD OF CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT; COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONSULTATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF DESIGN, SELECTION, IMPLEMENTATION AND USE OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE SYSTEMS FOR OTHERS; INSTALLATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DATA AUTOMATION AND COLLECTION SERVICE USING PROPRIETARY SOFTWARE TO EVALUATE, ANALYZE AND COLLECT SERVICE DATAACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 3, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 3, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 22, 2004ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Sep 13, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 14, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 1, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 12, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 6, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance