USPTO serial 76411362
RESPOSABLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HICKEY,TONI
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RESPOSABLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KURT L. GROSSMAN
KURT L GROSSMAN WOOD, HERRON & EVANS LLP2700 CAREW TWR441 VINE STCINCINNATI, OH 45202-2917Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Limited life reusable healthcare textile products, namely; surgical gowns; fenestrated and non-fenestrated surgical drapes; non-sterile surgical wrappers; medical apparel, namely; patient and pediatric gowns, pajama pants and tops, and patient robes; incontinence bed pads, blankets and pillow ticking | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Limited life reusable healthcare textile products, namely-- blankets and pillow ticking | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by STANDARD TEXTILE CO., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by STANDARD TEXTILE CO., INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named RESPOSABLE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |