USPTO serial 76411384
SWEET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SWEET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary B. Scott, Esq
THEODORE J. MLYNAR, ESQ KRAMER, LEVIN, NAFTALIS & FRANKEL1177 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS, 26TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | hair shampoo, bath powder, non-medicated bath salts, body cream, body powder, bubble bath, hair conditioners, hand cream, skin cream, facial scrubs, skin soap for use in connection with hotel, motel and resort lodging services | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Bath linen, bed blankets, bed canopies, bed pads, bed sheets, bed spreads, crib bumpers, crib canopies, pillow cases, cloth doilies, wash cloths, comforters, duvet covers, mattress covers, curtains, dust ruffles, duvets, eiderdowns; unfitted furniture covers, household linens, mattress pads, pillow shams, quilts, towels, washing mitts, shams, box spring covers, bed skirts, throw pillows, coverlet, shower curtains, bolster slipcovers for use in connection with hotel, motel and resort lodging services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Sheraton Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by The Sheraton Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named SWEET
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 22, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 2, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 17, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 10, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 15, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |