USPTO serial 76411536
THE COLOR PURPLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE COLOR PURPLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BUENA PARK, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. Donald Weber, Jr.
G DONALD WEBER JR18442 TAFT AVEVILLA PARK, CA 92861UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | ELECTRIC NAIL FILING MACHINE | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 6, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 6, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 6, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |