USPTO serial 76411627
CLEAR VUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 12, 2003
- Examiner
- KEAM, ALEX S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CLEAR VUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
FRESNO, CA
FRESNO, CA
Fresno, CA
Fresno, CA
Fresno, CA
LOLO, MT
AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT GROUP INTERNATIONAL, LLC
WASHINGTON, DC
Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT GROUP INTERNATIONAL, LLC
MISSOULA, MT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas M. Coester
THOMAS M. COESTER BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN1279 OAKMEAD PARKWAYSUNNYVALE, CA 94085-4040UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | finished composite security glass for automobiles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NEAL, MURRAY L.
- Other trademarks owned by NEAL, MURRAY L.
- Other trademarks owned by Pinnacle Armor, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Pinnacle Armor, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Pinnacle Armor, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by DS HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT GROUP INTERNATIONAL, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by GUARDIAN, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named CLEAR VUE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | PR23 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 3, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |