USPTO serial 76411907
SIGFX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SIGFX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ridgeland, MS
Ridgeland, MS
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer Mikulina, Esq.
JENNIFER MIKULINA ESQ MCDERMOTT, WILL & EMERY227 W MONROE ST STE 4400CHICAGO, IL 60606-5096UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunications and broadcasting apparatus, namely, wireless telephones, wireless handsets, signal processors, wireless electronic handheld apparatus used for receipt and transmission of data; stationary wireless apparatus providing synchronization of data between mobile devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications and broadcasting services, namely, transmission of voice, data, and graphics by means of analog and digital television transmissions and broadband transmissions | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical licensing services, namely, patents; research and development for others in the fields of electronics and telecommunications; product research and development in the fields of electronics and telecommunications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SigFX, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by SigFX, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SIGFX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 14, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 13, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 27, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 7, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |