USPTO serial 76412423
FULL SPECTRUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FULL SPECTRUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel J. Santos, Esquire
DANIEL J SANTOS ESQ THOMAS, KAYDEN, HORSTEMEYER & RISLEY100 GALLERIA PKWY NW STE 1750ATLANTA, GA 30339-5948UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Communications cables, namely fiber optical cable and hybrid cables incorporating fiber optical cable, optical fiber, dispersion-compensating modules, optical connectors, optical amplifiers, optical modulators, laser, optical attenuators, optical multiplexers, optical adaptors, optical terminators, jumpers, and telecommunications systems, namely optical networks incorporating optical fiber and/or fiber optic cable | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |