USPTO serial 76412446
VASCULAR SCIENCES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VASCULAR SCIENCES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tampa, FL
Tampa, FL
Tampa, FL
Palm Harbor, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sophie B. Anger, Esq.
SOPHIE B ANGER TORYS LLP237 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | MEDICAL APPARATUS FOR BLOOD FILTRATION, NAMELY, TUBING SETS, FILTERS, NEEDLES AND DIAGNOSTIC KITS FOR BLEEDING TIMES, MEDICAL RESEARCH APPARATUS FOR BLOOD FILTRATION, NAMELY, TUBING SETS, FILTERS, NEEDLES AND DIAGNOSTIC KITS FOR BLEEDING TIMES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Vascular Sciences Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Vascular Sciences Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Vascular Sciences Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by OCCULOGIX, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named VASCULAR SCIENCES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 29, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |