Drawing for VASCULAR SCIENCES

USPTO serial 76412446

VASCULAR SCIENCES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGH, TEJBIR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VASCULAR SCIENCES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sophie B. Anger, Esq.

SOPHIE B ANGER TORYS LLP237 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010MEDICAL APPARATUS FOR BLOOD FILTRATION, NAMELY, TUBING SETS, FILTERS, NEEDLES AND DIAGNOSTIC KITS FOR BLEEDING TIMES, MEDICAL RESEARCH APPARATUS FOR BLOOD FILTRATION, NAMELY, TUBING SETS, FILTERS, NEEDLES AND DIAGNOSTIC KITS FOR BLEEDING TIMESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 20, 2006ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Apr 19, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 21, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 21, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 11, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 29, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 29, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 29, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 29, 2004ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 29, 2004REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 21, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 2, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 2, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2004CNRUDISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED—
Mar 3, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 3, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 3, 2004AAUDAMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED—
Feb 11, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 23, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 22, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 22, 2004ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 31, 2003AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 31, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 31, 2003DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2003CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Oct 3, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 3, 20031.ADSEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED—
Sep 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance