USPTO serial 76412737
CIENCIAMAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CIENCIAMAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John L. DuPre
JOHN L DUPRE HAMILTON, BROOK, SMITH & REYNOLDS, PC530 VIRGINIA RDP O BOX 9133CONCORD, MA 01742-9133Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Nutrient and mineral fish food supplements to promote fish growth | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical consultation in the fields of aquaculture, breeding and growing fish, producing fish having particular characteristics, pearl formation, caviar and/or roe production, soft shell crustacean production, fish production with toxins, contaminants and/or parasites removed, and providing instructions for the production of fish products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MARICAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MariCal, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by MariCal, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CIENCIAMAR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 15, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 20, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |