USPTO serial 76412785
DURACET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DURACET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy A. Bush
Timothy A. Bush Sirote & Permutt, P.C.2311 Highland Avenue SouthBirmingham, AL 35205UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | pharmaceutical preparations, namely an analgesic for human consumption taken orally | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PROETHIC PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Proethic Laboratories, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Proethic Laboratories, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named DURACET
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 30, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 27, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |