USPTO serial 76413021
ER EASTWOOD RANCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ER EASTWOOD RANCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LOS ANGELES, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Miriam Claire Beezy
MIRIAM CLAIRE BEEZY GREENBERG GLUSKER FIELDS CLAMANSTE 21001900 AVE OF THE STARSLOS ANGELES, CA 90067-4590Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | GOODS, ALL MADE OF PRECIOUS METAL, NAMELY, SHOE ORNAMENTS, HAT ORNAMENTS, ORNAMENTAL PINS, DECORATIVE BOXES, POWDER COMPACTS OF PRECIOUS METAL, MONEY CLIPS, JEWELRY CASES; JEWELRY, NAMELY RINGS, BELT BUCKLES, EARRINGS, CUFFLINKS, BRACELETS, CHARMS, BROOCHES, NECKLACES, PENDANTS, TIE PINS, BOLO TIES, MEDALLIONS; CIGARETTE CASES AND LIGHTERS, STRAPS FOR WATCHES, WATCHES AND WRIST WATCHES, WATCH CHAINS, CASES FOR WATCHES, CLOCKS AND FLOWER BOWLS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |