USPTO serial 76413112
MIDATLANTIC AIRWAYS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2943132Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 19, 2005
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MIDATLANTIC AIRWAYS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD T. WHITE
EDWARD T WHITE HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLPRIVERFRONT PLZ E TWR951 E BYRD STRICHMOND, VA 23219-4074Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | AIR TRANSPORTATION SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 12, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |