Drawing for Serial No. 76413157

USPTO serial 76413157

Serial No. 76413157

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALTREE, NICHOLAS
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 76413157?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laura E. Smith

LAURA E SMITH KALOW & SPRINGUT LLP488 MADISON AVE 19TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014horological and chronometric instruments, namely, watchesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 20, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 20, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 22, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 31, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 31, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 4, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 13, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 2, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 3, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 4, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 4, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 22, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 13, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 24, 20031.ADSEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED—
Jul 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance