Drawing for FORWARD THINKING

USPTO serial 76413235

FORWARD THINKING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ESTRADA, LINDA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FORWARD THINKING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard P. Gilly

RICHARD P GILLY WOLF, BLOCK, SCHORR AND SOLIS-COHEN LLP22ND FL1650 ARCH STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025EQUESTRIAN APPAREL, NAMELY BREECHES, BAGS FOR BREECHES, BERMUDA SHORTS, CAMP SHIRTS, BLOUSES, CHAPS, CARDIGANS, COATS, DENIM JACKETS, DUSTERS, FLEECE PULLOVERS, HEADBANDS, HEADWEAR, JACKETS, JERSEYS, KNIT SHIRTS, LEGGINGS, MOCK TURTLENECK SWEATERS, NECKERCHIEFS, BANDANNAS, PAJAMAS, POLO SHIRTS, PULLOVERS, RAIN JACKETS, RAINWEAR, RAIN SUITS, RIDING COATS, SHORTS, SHORT SETS, SLEEPWEAR, SUN VISORS, SWEAT SUITS, SWEAT PANTS, SWEATSHIRTS, TURTLENECKS, T-SHIRTS, VISORS, WIND RESISTANT JACKETS, AND WIND SHIRTSACTIVE—
035MAIL ORDER AND ELECTRONIC CATALOG SERVICES FEATURING EQUESTRIAN APPAREL AND TACK; RETAIL STORE AND RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING EQUESTRIAN APPAREL AND TACK; COMPUTERIZED ON-LINE RETAIL SERVICES FEATURING EQUESTRIAN APPAREL AND TACK; WHOLESALE ORDERING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF EQUESTRIAN APPAREL AND TACK; WHOLESALE STORES FEATURING EQUESTRIAN APPAREL AND TACKACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 19, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 29, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 23, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 23, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 23, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 1, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 11, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 30, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance