USPTO serial 76413282
HYPERMOTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HYPERMOTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Edmonton, Alberta T6N 1E4, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary D. Krugman
GARY D KRUGMAN SUGHRUE MION PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ROBOTIC PLATFORMS CONSISTING OF A PROGRAMMABLE SIX-LEGGED TABLE OR PLATFORM TO SIMULATE BIOMECHANICAL MOTION FOR BIOMECHANICAL TESTING FOR EXPERIMENTAL PURPOSES OF DETERMINING BONE AND TISSUE MATERIAL PROPERTIES, BONE AND TISSUE IMPLANT MATERIAL PROPERTIES, BONE AND TISSUE IMPLANT FUNCTION PERFORMANCE, AND NORMAL AND ABNORMAL BONE AND TISSUE FUNCTION, AND BIOMECHANICAL TESTING OF ANIMAL AND HUMAN JOINTS FOR WEAR, AND IMPLANT COMPONENTS FOR WEAR | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PROVISION OF SOFTWARE PROGRAMMING AND ENGINEERING IN THE FIELD OF BIOMECHANICS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 15, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 1, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |