USPTO serial 76413421
KAYAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KAYAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
6301 Zug, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Beth M. Goldman, Esq.
BETH M GOLDMAN ESQ HELLER, EHRMAN, WHITE & MCAULIFFE LLP333 BUSH STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-2878UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed matter and publications, namely, educational books; printed lessons and lectures, forms, diagrams, loose leaf binders, computer program documentation and manuals, and newsletters, reports and brochures, all in the fields of financial systems, management, business, information technology, supply chain management and systems, human resources, customer relationship management, sales force automation, enterprise resource planning, strategic change, business process reengineering, data warehousing and data mining | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |