Drawing for JOVY PINGOOS

USPTO serial 76413653

JOVY PINGOOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MATTESSICH, DANIELLE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JOVY PINGOOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LIC. CONNY GUTIERREZ WONG

RENEE ROBLES GWT10 MADISON LNHILTON HEAD ISLAND, SC 29926UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables, jellies, james and fruit saucesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 16, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 6, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 13, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance