Drawing for REDSTAG

USPTO serial 76413751

REDSTAG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REDSTAG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KEITH W. MEDANSKY

KEITH W MEDANSKY PIPER RUDNICKP O BOX 64807CHICAGO, IL 60664-0807UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Building materials of a predominantly nonmetal character, namely processed, manufactured, sawn, worked and/or building timber; timber and wood paneling; wood flooring, paving and veneersACTIVE—
031Forestry products, seeds, plants and tissue culture; namely, timber in undressed or unswan state; logs, wood chips for manufacture of wood pulp; wood fiber; pulp particles and chips; and raw barkACTIVE—
035Wholesale distributorship featuring timber; wholesale order services in the field of timber; wholesale stores featuring timber; online retail store services featuring timber; and retail store services featuring timberACTIVE—
042Technical consulting, research and testing in the field of forestry, agricultural engineering and design services; and land surveyingACTIVE—
044Landscape gardening servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 4, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 4, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 25, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 14, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 14, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 16, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 23, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 3, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 15, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 2, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 30, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 26, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 8, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance