USPTO serial 76413792
FINESQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 23, 2004
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FINESQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard B. Biagi, Esq.
RICHARD B BIAGI NEAL & MCDEVITT LLC1776 ASH STNORTHFIELD, IL 60093UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Fabric, namely Woven fabric, Knitted fabric, Chenille fabric, Cheviot fabric, Cotton fabric, Curtain fabric, Esparto fabric, Nylon fabric, Polyester fabric, Ramie fabric and Rayon fabric, felt cloth and textiles, namely hand towels of textile, tapestries of textile, textile fabrics for the manufacture of clothing, textile linings for garments, textile napkins, textile place mats, textile printers' blankets, textile used as lining for clothing and textile wall hangings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 2, 2003 |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, dresses, pants and tops, footwear and headwear | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 3, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Esquel Enterprises Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Esquel Enterprises Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Esquel Enterprises Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named FINESQ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 24, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 29, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |