USPTO serial 76413907
HERBAL TEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HERBAL TEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sheung Shui, New Territories, HK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Louis K. Ebling
LOUIS K EBLING GREENEBAUM DOLL & MCDONALD PLLC2800 CHEMED CTR255 E FIFTH STCINCINNATI, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 023 | Yarns and threads, for textile use | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Textiles for use in the manufacture of draperies, upholstery, clothing, furniture coverings, bed linen, sheets, comforters, duvets, duvet covers, bedskirts, pillows, pillow cases, neckroll covers, shams, bolsters, bath linen, curtains, valances, window scarves, window panels, window blinds, cushion covers, household linen, kitchen linen, bed blankets, bed covers, bedspreads, quilts, throws, plaids, coverlets, bed caps, bath sheets, table linen, tablecloths, table runners and toppers, placemats, napkins, table napkins, towels, terrys, bath curtains, bath mats, carpets; textile goods, namely draperies, upholstery, clothing, furniture coverings, bed linen, sheets, comforters, duvets, duvet covers, bedskirts, pillows, pillow cases, neckrolls, neckroll covers, shams, bolsters, bath linen, curtains, valances, window scarves, window panels, window blinds, cushion covers, household linen, kitchen linen, bed blankets, bed covers, bedspreads, quilts, throws, plaids, coverlets, bed caps, bath sheets, table linen, tablecloths, table runners and toppers, placemats, napkins, table napkins, towels, terrys, bath curtains, bath mats, carpets | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, jackets, shirts, pants, dresses, socks, t-shirts, sweaters, underwear, pajamas, gloves, scarves, headbands, footwear, headwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 16, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |