USPTO serial 76414272
HOTELS.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3337609Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 20, 2007
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HOTELS.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason M. Vogel
Jason M. Vogel Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP1114 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | PROVIDING INFORMATION FOR OTHERS ABOUT TEMPORARY LODGING; TRAVEL AGENCY SERVICES, NAMELY, MAKING RESERVATIONS AND BOOKINGS FOR TEMPORARY LODGING FOR OTHERS BY MEANS OF TELEPHONE AND THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 29, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 8, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 3, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |