USPTO serial 76414342
B2WIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 24, 2006
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with B2WIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Paris - 75015, FR
Paris - 75015, FR
Paris - 75015, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher J. Day
Christopher J Day Law Office of Christopher Day9977 North 90th Street, Suite 155Scottsdale, AZ 85258UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION SERVICES; ON LINE RETAIL STORE SERVICES, FEATURING BOOKS, REPORTS, JOURNALS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 2, 2002 |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES FEATURING THE TRANSMISSION OF DATA AND IMAGES BY TELEPHONE; TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRIC, DIGITAL, CELLULAR AND WIRELESS TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, DATA, INFORMATION, IMAGES, SIGNALS AND MESSAGES; PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS OVER A GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK; PROVIDING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE IN THE FIELD OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS; TELECOMMUNICATION NEWS AND TELECOMMUNICATION INFORMATION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 2, 2002 |
| 042 | PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE FIELDS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, COMPUTER AND COMPUTER SYSTEMS; COMPUTER CONSULTING IN THE AREAS OF COMPUTERS, COMPUTER SYSTEMS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, COMPUTER NETWORKS AND COMPUTER SYSTEM SECURITY; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, DESIGN OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS FOR OTHERS, COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS, AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CONSULTING SERVICES; INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR SERVICES OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PROBLEMS VIA TELEPHONE, E-MAIL, REMOTE ELECTRONIC CONNECTIONS, POSTINGS ON GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS AND SITE VISITS; DESIGNING, IMPLEMENTING, CREATING, MAINTAINING AND HOSTING WEBSITES FOR OTHERS ON A COMPUTER SERVER FOR A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; DATABASE SERVICES, NAMELY, MAINTAINING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE IN THE FIELD OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS, TELECOMMUNICATION NEWS AND TELECOMMUNICATION INFORMATION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 2, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Petit de Bantel, Eric
- Other trademarks owned by Petit de Bantel, Eric
- Other trademarks owned by Petit de Bantel, Eric
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named B2WIN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 11, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |