USPTO serial 76414483
NUTRA-TOPIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NUTRA-TOPIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Kitchener Ontario, CA
Kitchener Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Michael Bean
D MICHAEL BEAN GOWLING LAFLEUR HENDERSON LLP50 QUEEN ST N STE 1020KITCHENER, ON N2H 6M2CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | topping comprised of dried fruits, nuts and seeds for use on breakfast cereal, oatmeal, ice cream, yogurt, pancakes and salads and inside cake mixes and pancake mixes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 9, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |