USPTO serial 76414542
BOOM BORN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOOM BORN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | SWIMWEAR, SHIRTS, JACKETS, SWEATERS, JOGGING SUITS, SKIWEAR, LEOTARDS, FOOTWEAR, HEADGEAR, ACTIVE WEAR CLOTHING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 11, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 31, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |