USPTO serial 76414802
ER EASTWOOD RANCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ER EASTWOOD RANCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Miriam Claire Beezy
MIRIAM CLAIRE BEEZY GREENBERG GLUSKER FIELDS CLAMAN1900 AVE OF THE STARSSTE 2100LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-4590Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Furniture, namely, armchairs, armoires, bathroom vanities, bedroom furniture, benches, book stands, bookcases, cabinets, chairs, chaise lounges, chests of drawers, couches, crendenzas, cushions, desks, dining room tables, divans, dog beds, fireplace screens, drafting tables, entertainment centers, office furniture, ottomans, outdoor furniture, dressers, wall units, recliners, seats, sofas, stools, tables, work benches; bag closures not of metal; jewelry boxes not of metal, jewelry cases not of precious metal and pillows | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Eastwood Ranch LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Eastwood Ranch LLC
- Other trademarks owned by EASTWOOD, ALISON
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named ER EASTWOOD RANCH
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |