USPTO serial 76414985
S.A.C.K.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with S.A.C.K.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Yorba Linda, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WM. GREG BENNETT
WM GREG BENNETT ESQ BENNETT & BENNETT27368 VIA INDUSTRIA, STE 112TEMECULA, CA 92590UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROMOTING PUBLIC AWARENESS OF THE NEED FOR ACTS OF CARE AND KINDNESS TO BUILD A BETTER WORLD | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1999 |
| 036 | CHARITABLE FUND RAISING | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1999 |
| 041 | TEACHING IN THE FIELD OF CHRISTIAN CHARITY, NAMELY CARE AND KINDNESS; EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING WORKSHOPS, CLASSES, CONFERENCES AND FESTIVALS IN THE FIELD OF CHRISTIAN CHARITY, NAMELY CARE AND KINDNESS | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |