USPTO serial 76415156
IMAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IMAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
W. Joseph Melnik
W JOSEPH MELNIK BENESCH, FRIEDLANDER, COPLAN2300 BP TWR200 PUBLIC SQCLEVELAND, OH 44114-2378Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical compositions and chemical preparations composed of organic and inorganic chemical and materials for use in the manufacture of fuel cell materials, materials for electronics, custom catalysts, and high-value dispersions and emulsions for diverse industries, including polymers, coatings and pharmaceuticals; catalysts for use in the manufacture of industrial chemicals | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Treatment and processing of organic and inorganic chemicals and materials, namely, fuel cell materials, materials for electronics, custom catalysts, and high-value dispersions and emulsions for diverse industries, including polymers, coatings and pharmaceuticals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |