USPTO serial 76415334
GAMESA VUALA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GAMESA VUALA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CORPORATIVO INTERNACIONAL MEXICANO, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.
Mexico City, MX
Other trademarks owned by CORPORATIVO INTERNACIONAL MEXICANO, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.
CORPORATIVO INTERNACIONAL MEXICANO, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.
Col. Lomas de Chapultepec, Mexico, MX
Other trademarks owned by CORPORATIVO INTERNACIONAL MEXICANO, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph J. Ferretti
JOSEPH J FERRETTI MAIL STOP 3A-441FRITO-LAY INC7701 LEGACY DRPLANO, TX 75024Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | COOKIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CORPORATIVO INTERNACIONAL MEXICANO, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by CORPORATIVO INTERNACIONAL MEXICANO, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named GAMESA VUALA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 4, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 7, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 30, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 12, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 13, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 29, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 6, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |