Drawing for PROTECTINT

USPTO serial 76415339

PROTECTINT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DIXON, JENNIFER HAZARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROTECTINT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

AMY E. CARROLL

AMY E CARROLL C/O DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP1500 K ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Nail products and nail treatments, namely, nail creams and lotions, nail polish top and base coat, nail conditioners, nail adhesives, nail oils, nail hardeners and strengtheners, nail polish remover, nail tips, nail enamel, nail varnish, nail color, nail toners, cuticle creams and lotions, cuticle conditioners, cuticle oils, cuticle repair and cuticle revitalizerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 7, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 20, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 22, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 25, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 16, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 14, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 1, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 24, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance