USPTO serial 76415400
HAWAIIAN BLEND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3195404Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 9, 2007
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HAWAIIAN BLEND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
B & B ISLAND DISTRIBUTING, LLC
Honolulu, HI
B & B ISLAND DISTRIBUTING, LLC
Honolulu, HI
B & B ISLAND DISTRIBUTING, LLC
Honolulu, HI
MILLIANI, HI
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by B & B ISLAND DISTRIBUTING, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by B & B ISLAND DISTRIBUTING, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by B & B ISLAND DISTRIBUTING, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ISLANDER GROUP, INC., THE
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named HAWAIIAN BLEND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 30, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 26, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |