Drawing for MONSENOR DE LA HABANA

USPTO serial 76415482

MONSENOR DE LA HABANA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2872267Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 10, 2004
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONSENOR DE LA HABANA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David W. Pettis, Jr., Esq.

ARTHUR W. FISHER, III5553 WEST WATERS AVENUETAMPA, FL 33634UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
034cigarsSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2010C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Jun 25, 2010CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 15, 2010CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Aug 12, 2009PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 6, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 28, 2004CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
May 11, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 3, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 6, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 12, 2003SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 21, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 21, 2003EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Mar 11, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 17, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 27, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 22, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance