USPTO serial 76415546
XETRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with XETRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karl F. Milde, Jr.
KARL F MILDE JR MILDE & HOFFBERG, LLP10 BANK ST STE 460WHITE PLAINS, NY 10606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for processing financial data, stock data, banking data, broker's data and other data relating to financial, stock, banking and broker's transactions; computer software used to provide access to electronic banking and electronic stock exchange and electronic commerce platforms and systems; computer operating system programs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 12, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 10, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 30, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 14, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | 44ED | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |