Drawing for NCI SERVICES, INC.

USPTO serial 76415562

NCI SERVICES, INC.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2935681Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 29, 2005
Examiner
SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NCI SERVICES, INC.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kyle M. Globerman

Kyle M. Globerman Altisource Solutions, Inc.2002 Summit Blvd., Suite 600Atlanta, GA 30319UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036debt recovery and collection agenciesSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 30, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 30, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2011C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Jul 16, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 11, 2011C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Jul 11, 2011ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 15, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 2, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 26, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 27, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 21, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 30, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 26, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 12, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 16, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance