USPTO serial 76415775
AVALMIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AVALMIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
POTURAJU SURYA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA
HYDERABAD, ANDHRA PRADESH, IN
Other trademarks owned by POTURAJU SURYA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RAMESH B VISHWANATH
RAMESH B VISHWANATH VISHWANATH & COMPANY# H1, SREE APTSBHARATNAGAR (MOOSAPET), HYDERABAD 18HYDERABAD ANDHRA PRADESH, 500 018Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | HOHOMEOPATHIC, AYURVEDIC and ALLOPATHIC PHARMACEUTICAL MEDICINES FOR TREATMENT OF AIDS and OTHER DISEASES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |